Yuck.

Jane is one of the few ‘mainstream’ magazines that I regularly pick up and read – mostly because it’s full of tidbits and interviews that don’t annoy me. The product reviews are usually quite decent, I like the “Makeunder” section, and generally enjoy reading the articles. It’s not ideal – after all, there can only be one Bitch and one Bust – but Jane‘ll do in a pinch.

Flipping through the September issue of Jane this morning, I came across the usual assortment of folded pages containing perfume samples – the sort where you open the fold and can sniff the product, or rub it on your wrists or tuck it into your lingerie drawer or whatever the hell people normally do with them. (Me, I try not to breathe deeply while flipping past. Heh.)

Among the various pages was an ad that featured a white-fluffy-dress-clad woman posing in a half-yoga, half-seductive pose on a shimmery, watery surface. There was no product identifier – and the text read, “Beguile your senses. Succumb to the freshness.” I flipped the page and discovered it was an ad for Tampax “fresh” – which is apparently, “the new cardboard tampon with a light clean scent”. Of course, I pried open the page and sniffed. Perfumey-powdery-ick.

I have issues with this ad. Several, in fact.

1. “The new cardboard tampon” – umm, please tell me you mean “cardboard applicator” and not cardboard TAMPON.
2. There is no smell from your period until the blood hits the air. There is no reason to scent tampons – once they’re removed, they’re disposed of. Most people I know don’t wave them around in the air before they flush/dispose of ‘em.
3. Why do we need to convince women – of any age – that their cooter should be scented like anything OTHER than cooter?

Grr.

  1. steward’s avatar

    http://www.tampax.com/en_us/pages/common.shtml?pageid=tf0001

    “Tampax Fresh – the only cardboard tampon that doesn’t smell like cardboard.”

    I guess that’s why they have to scent it… the cardboard smell overwhelms both the blood smell and the cooter smell…

    Reply

  2. R.’s avatar

    I dislike Jane magazine. Too many androgenous stick figures. I once read an article in Jane magazine about how… “I once like dated this guy who was a conservative asshole but he was like Libertarian so you shouldn’t vote Libertarian because they are all like jerks and stuff.” So much for the informed female vote that’s supposed to save America.

    Bitch magazine is banned from the commode.

    I like Bust magazine. Bust taught me that I could cut the tips off lemons and put them in a bra to make large natural looking nipples. I don’t know when I’ll need large natural looking nipples but damn they look fine.

    Ladies, do you have Cardboard Cooteroma?

    Wow. Just… Wow.

    R.

    Reply

  3. Alison’s avatar

    I’ve not read Jane since they interviewed Justin Timberlake and had a bad time at it. So, to retaliate to him for making such a bad impression, they put as a headline on the cover something like “I’m Really Really Gay: A Hollywood A-Lister Confesses, page 125″. Then, turning to 125, it was their JT interview. The thought that they would use a gay joke and call someone gay (on the cover no less) because they had a bad interview turned me from the publication. I do like bitch and bust.

    Reply

  4. Manservant Steve’s avatar

    Three cheers for bringing the word ‘cooter’ back to it’s once proud glory. It’s just damn fun to say, isn’t it? Cooooooo-turrrrrrr!

    I plan on trying to singlehandedly bring “poontang” back into the vernacular of society. Because it’s fun to say as well, plus all of the ‘tang’ OJ references that can be expolited.

    Coming soon – the return of the ‘bearded clam’!!!!

    Reply