<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/</link>
	<description>suck it up, buttercup...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steward</title>
		<link>http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>Quit bitching and moaning and start publishing info on abortifacients.  You can&#039;t do a thing about what South Dakota does... but you -can- start making sure info gets onto the web about things like the acupressure point that induces a safe miscarriage, and herbs that people have used for millennia for the same thing.

On the legal front in the US, though... personally, having seen Roberts&#039; decisions so far, I think Bush and the fundamentalist right is in for a big surprise when and if the South Dakota law makes it to the US Supreme Court.  US Chief Justice Roberts is a &lt;i&gt;legal&lt;/i&gt; conservative, which is far different from an &lt;i&gt;ideological&lt;/i&gt; conservative.  Legal conservatives don&#039;t like changes in established precedent, and they tend to let their legal conservatism override any ideological beliefs they have.

Justice Alito hasn&#039;t participated in any Supreme Court decisions yet, so he&#039;s still an unknown... but that cuts both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quit bitching and moaning and start publishing info on abortifacients.  You can&#8217;t do a thing about what South Dakota does&#8230; but you -can- start making sure info gets onto the web about things like the acupressure point that induces a safe miscarriage, and herbs that people have used for millennia for the same thing.</p>
<p>On the legal front in the US, though&#8230; personally, having seen Roberts&#8217; decisions so far, I think Bush and the fundamentalist right is in for a big surprise when and if the South Dakota law makes it to the US Supreme Court.  US Chief Justice Roberts is a <i>legal</i> conservative, which is far different from an <i>ideological</i> conservative.  Legal conservatives don&#8217;t like changes in established precedent, and they tend to let their legal conservatism override any ideological beliefs they have.</p>
<p>Justice Alito hasn&#8217;t participated in any Supreme Court decisions yet, so he&#8217;s still an unknown&#8230; but that cuts both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.</title>
		<link>http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>I see it as insuring a supply of future American soldiers to take over Canada and their oil reserves ;)

In some ways this is a win for state&#039;s rights (even if they only got it as a result of the federal government supporting their anti-abortion positions.) I&#039;m still wondering why a supposedly limited government is even involved in what seems to me to be a family matter - but power must be asserted or lost and it would be uncharacteristic of leadership to miss any scrap of opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see it as insuring a supply of future American soldiers to take over Canada and their oil reserves ;)</p>
<p>In some ways this is a win for state&#8217;s rights (even if they only got it as a result of the federal government supporting their anti-abortion positions.) I&#8217;m still wondering why a supposedly limited government is even involved in what seems to me to be a family matter &#8211; but power must be asserted or lost and it would be uncharacteristic of leadership to miss any scrap of opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miserablebliss.ca/blog/2006/02/24/really/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>It scares me to think that roe vs. wade will be overturned and the right to choose a thing of the past in every state!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It scares me to think that roe vs. wade will be overturned and the right to choose a thing of the past in every state!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

