I love Hanne.
“Well, the way I see it, being bisexual is sensible. It means that when the right person comes along, you won’t be so likely to get so hung up on what kind of genitals or gender that person has. Also, it’s sensible to be attracted to people who are attractive.”
It goes so nicely with some of her other comments:
In a culture where sex, gender, and sexuality are presumed to be binary in nature, an identity based on insisting that you be permitted to choose neither, either, or both, at any time, without asking for permission or changing stances in order to do so — is so fundamentally rebellious as to be an act of outright anarchy. It is autocratic. Because our bisexualities come in an enormous range of flavors and tints, they are unpredictable, and any consensus we can form is acknowledged at the outset to only go so far. Our question-mark sexuality is not only resistance to the pick-a-side binary, it is an act of fiat in a culture where acts of fiat are incredibly scary. Our consistent inconsistency makes us outlaws.
In some ways, this can be said of anyone in this culture who desires openly. When we desire whom we desire, love whom we love, and fuck whom we fuck, we present the world with a fait accompli. But when we also make it clear — and this is one of the few places where our identity politics truly serve us — that our fait accompli may or may not be replicated the same way twice, we turn on the neon in our question marks and they become unmissable, unmistakable, unignorable.
Recent Comments.