Those of you who read some of the well-known feminist blogs are aware that there’s a debate getting fired up regarding whether or not a feminist woman should give blowjobs. Whether it’s all patriarchy-worshipping or just plain gross and wrong. The point isn’t the actual blog post that inspired all the explosions, it’s the comments attached from readers. Twisty is a beautiful shit-disturber at the best of times – but even disregarding the potential for disturbing-of-said-shit, I’m stunned nonetheless by how many other blogs have leaped onto the subject and how many people are shouting that putting a penis in your mouth should mean you burn your feminist membership card.
To this whole debate I say, Are you fucking kidding me?
In my world, feminism means I can do anything I want with no restrictions imposed as a result of my gender. It’s seriously that simple to me.
I can be a firefighter, I can punch people, I can go topless, I can choose not to wear makeup (or choose to wear a lot of it), I can choose to shave my legs or not, I can stand on my head and sing the National Anthem, I can play sports or knit, and none of my actions make me more or less of a worthy person. If I choose to stay home and make a hundred babies and boil preserves on a woodstove while standing around in my bare feet, I’m still a feminist. I’m still a feminist because I was aware of my options, I made the choice for myself and my own happiness and because I believe that other women should make their own choices, too.
The key word here is CHOICE. It’s about having the freedom to make choices for myself as a PERSON, not as a WOMAN. My personality and my interests dictate what I do with my life, not the fact that I have no penis. We encourage men to try ‘softer’ things like knitting and sewing and creative writing, but we shun women who do because it’s a ‘stereotypical female thing’. That’s bullshit.
At this point in time, sadly, some of my choices may make it harder for me to interact with the general public. There are women who don’t approve of certain “unfeminine” behaviours and there are men who still believe I should behave as though it’s 1871. Sometimes I choose to do something more ‘female’ in order to fit in – but I try hard to avoid that. Ultimately, and ideally, the legal system protects me from any discrimination based on my gender – which means it’s now up to me to walk the walk and talk the talk. To pick my battles wisely. To remind society that women are, get this, people! and are no different than men in any way when it comes to living life fully.
I’m not in denial. I know shit is still harder for women, sometimes. I know the legal system fails, sometimes. I know there are a lot of people out there who walk a fine line every single day. I know women are still fighting crappy situations in which their lack of a penis is apparently a problem for some. Ultimately I have to live as though I’m equal in the eyes of everyone in the world – that’s the only way I know of that things will change for the better as time goes by.
But, um, back to blowjobs…
Assuming one uses the term ‘blowjob’ to pertain only to the oral stimulation of men (in other words, ‘fellatio’ = ‘blowjob’) then what we’re talking about here is whether it’s right or wrong for me to provide pleasure to a man. Given that my chosen life partner is a man, and given that I enjoy watching his eyes roll back into his head, it seems like a no-brainer that I’d fling myself down on his penis any ol’ time of day that I get the urge. Not because he begs me to, or demands that I do it, and not because he holds my head in place – that’s not choice. That’s control. I do it because I enjoy giving him pleasure and I have no objections to providing it orally. It’s the equivalent, albeit somewhat messier and more dramatic, to offering to scratch his back when it’s itchy. It’s the same as massaging his shoulders when he’s sore, or grabbing him a tylenol when he has a headache. I don’t always do THOSE things – I mean, sometimes I don’t even offer to grab him a tylenol when I’m up. Sometimes I don’t feel like giving him a blowjob. And so, I don’t.
It doesn’t even depend on whether or not he’s willing to pleasure ME orally. (For the sake of conversation, Coffee would happily spend all day, every day, with his face shoved between my thighs – and you’re welcome for that new visual which will never, ever EVER leave your brain..) The fact is that we all have different comfort levels, and it’s something I think people need to respect. Sex, as part of a relationship, isn’t 50/50. It isn’t “you touch here and then I’ll touch there”. I love to have my feet massaged – but I never do it back to Coffee. Does that mean he should never ever massage my feet again? It makes sense to give what you can, to ask why you’re not comfortable with other actions, to tell your partner what you really, really like. All sex should be negotiated like S/M relationships – a questioning of desires, a questioning of what’s involved, and equal consent. No one ever died from not getting oral pleasure. And on that same note, I have never heard anyone say that a man is less manly if he’s willing to provide some oral stimulation to his partner. You cannot give me the ol’ double standard on this subject.
I know, comparing foot massages to blowjobs and S/M seems .. strange. But ultimately, it’s about pleasure. It’s about the things we do to and for our partner. It’s about knowing what you’re comfortable with and giving it as freely as possible. It’s not about forcing yourself to do something you’re not comfortable with – and if your partner insists on it, s/he’s an asshole. It’s not a subserviant thing to offer pleasure. It’s a kindness, in a way. I like to do nice things for Coffee, sometimes, and it’s got nothing to do with calculating how much he’s done for me. We are a partnership – and that means we look out for each other, we do things to make each other happy and we pay attention to one another. Sexually and non.
Sex is always kept in some strange compartment. Society is more than willing to talk openly about who does the dishes at night or who walks the dogs, but we clam up about problems in bed. We make jokes about frigid wives and philandering husbands, but we don’t talk much about those issues in serious tones. We’re embarassed, in some cases, to admit that we have sex – and we’re equally embarassed to admit when we don’t. We hide our kinks and our fetishes and our desires – sometimes even from the one person who would most be willing to try something new with us.
Then we take something that’s good and healthy and normal, something like a blowjob, and we make it political.
It’s not. It’s not even a little bit political. It’s a choice like any other. It’s got nothing to do with feminism or anti-feminism. It’s.. an orgasm.
I’m would never say that it’s wrong to not like blowjobs – getting or giving and for any reason at all – but I am saying that you can’t judge me or anyone else as being “anti-women” if we decide to pleasure our partners in any way we choose. It’s a mutual pleasure, by the way. I’m not sitting there with his wang in my mouth but secretly wishing I was watching Oprah. (God, I hate Oprah.)
To sum:
The point of feminism is that I, as a woman, can make any choice I want with regard to how I live my life and what I put in my mouth for any purpose. If you choose to give head, more power to you. If you choose not to give head, rock on, too.
I am a feminist and I suck cock.
-
LOL! I haven’t read the article in question yet, but I will certainly skedaddle over there anon and read it when I’m done typing here. :)
Everything to me is political. I know I’m a bit of an anomoly though.
I have never believed feminism is about choice, because when given the option, people usually pick what’s comfortable to them, and not what is necessarily*right* — and yes, I realize that’s one LOADED word. An abused woman will often choose to stay with her rapist. Muslim women will choose to wear the veil. Abused children will choose to stay with their abusive parents… because the unknown is scary, and I guess better the devil you know.
I have always maintained that feminism should be about elevating women’s economic and socio-economic status to the male counterpart, and that has precious little to do with choice. Sometimes it needs to be mandated. For example I believe there should be more women in politics. It’s a near impossible task to get women to run in politics, so I had to do it myself in order to walk the walk with my head held high, seeing as I talk the talk a lot. True, I chose to run, but I did it grudgingly as it was scary and unknown and I got bad press and made some enemies and all that jazz. But I hope that ONE young girl watching the cable 14 debates maybe saw me up there and thought I CAN DO THAT TOO. And it will evolve.
I don’t know if I’m making myself clear, and I’m not even TOUCHING on blowjobs, but just thought I’d throw that one out there for you. :)
Jo
-
Exactly! Couldn’t have put it better myself. Why would I want to exchange one set of facist dogma for another? Who you telling how to be a feminist, Gloria Steinem? Not me, you’re not. My self-realization is my business. I can win a Nobel prize on Monday, take my shirt off in Waterloo Park on Tuesday, speak truth to power on Wednesday, give my partner the toe-curlingest blow job of his life on Thursday, pick up my paintings from the National Art Gallery on Friday, feed pigeons in the park in my purple hat on Saturday and worship my Big Black Goddess any time of the day or night. Hallelujah, sistah.
Now back to my cab franc. :)
-
I agree with you. IMO some women confuse sexism and body issues with feminism. Some (maybe most?) guys just want to fuck and be fucked. If a woman doesn’t like giving BJ’s then they need to find a partner who doesn’t get off on BJ’s – no need to get all female chauvinist about it.
-
aside and OT @Jo:
“Muslim women will choose to wear the veil”well – but what about those who are genuinely religious and deliberately take the veil? what about women who are not born into Islam but who come to it in their adult lives as a result of their own personal experiences?
-
Pingback from Infighting keeps us honest at PunkAssBlog.com on 18 June 06 at 1:25 pm
-
well – but what about those who are genuinely religious and deliberately take the veil? what about women who are not born into Islam but who come to it in their adult lives as a result of their own personal experiences?
My mother and I have had this discussion, because although she didn’t ‘choose to wear the veil’ she did the christian equivalent. She lives a devoutly catholic life and calls it her choice. I think, for her, it’s the path of least resistance, because she was conditioned from birth to be a good catholic girl and it takes little effort for her to be passive or submissive or what have you. To choose to go against that would be the difficult task for her. She’s not wired that way.
I think women who discover Islam later in life and choose to wear the veil (and a coworker’s wife has done that very thing, and we’ve had long talks about it) choose the path of least resistance too. If the worst thing you have to deal with as a veiled up Westerner are the odd looks of those who used to be your friends, well, the gain is a spiritual community where you fit in. I guess it’s cultish in that way.
I try not to judge Islam (I bash all world religions pretty equally) it’s just that they have the purest example of a behaviour/custom/dogma that isolates women and IMHO suppresses them.
Comments are now closed.




7 comments